Mars Curiosity at Rocknest

RocknestNASA scientist John Grotzinger got himself in hot water when he said the Mars Curiosity team had “some exciting new results,” that was “one for the history books.” NASA quickly downplayed the whirlwind of speculation that arose, and yesterday released their results.

Although Grotzinger has not clarified the reason for his comments, it seems there are two points that could have generated his excitement. The first is that the ratio of water in the sample was higher than expected.

Given the arid nature of the Martian landscape, its low temperatures and low atmospheric pressure, sitting right at the triple-point of water (which means water ice sublimates into a gas without becoming liquid), even a small percentage of dust-bound water molecules is surprising, and bodes well for the notion that Mars may once have been a wet planet. That this could be detected in a drift of loose sand particles is remarkable.

Mars Curiosity Gas ReadingsMore than likely, though, Grotzinger’s excitement came from the SAM instruments detecting complex carbon molecules, but these are thought to have originated on Earth.

Given the fastidious sterilisation procedures Mars Curiosity was put through, where components were assembled in a clean room, subject to alcohol swabbing, baking at extreme temperatures beyond the limits of microbial survival, etc, this finding highlights just how astonishingly sensitive the Curiosity instruments are.

Bacteria are surprisingly persistent and robust, more so than most people would realize. The average human carries somewhere in the order of 200 trillion microbes. It is practically impossible to completely sterilize a probe like Curiosity, but it was cleaned to an estimated 300,000 microbes across the entire space craft, which is considerably cleaner than your kitchen bench.

Mars Chlorine Sample

The good news is, such a high degree of sensitivity in the Mars Curiosity SAM package may have triggered a false-positive this time around, but it also confirms the design as being capable of detecting organics at the lowest of levels.

Rocknest may not have delivered “one for the history books,” but Mars Curiosity is on track to revolutionize planetary science. Grotzinger may have been over-enthusiastic, but that’s a wonderful trait to have in exploration.

6 thoughts on “Mars Curiosity at Rocknest

    • And it’s interesting to note that NASA hasn’t ruled out the possibility that the carbon molecules were Martian, their official stance is that it “remains to be established with ongoing analysis, future laboratory work and experiments on Mars.” So Grotzinger may yet be right about this being one for the history books 🙂

    • They may yet confirm the rocknest organics as legit, but it’s doubtful. All this does bode well for the sensitivity of the Mars Curiosity instruments. If there’s life anywhere near the surface, Curiosity should find it. My concern is that the most likely place to find life on Mars is below the ground in aquifers. The only time it’s exposed to the Martian atmosphere is when crater walls collapse in the spring and subsurface water runs off, but that ground would be so steep and unstable I don’t imagine they’d risk Curiosity there.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s