After the Afterword


My latest novel, Clowns, is a rather different take on First Contact with an extraterrestrial species. The central conceit is—What would an alien civilization think about our level of intelligence?

We may have landed rovers on Mars, walked on the Moon, and invented astonishingly complex, fast and compact computers, but are those really a measure of intelligence? They’re certainly not a measure of my intelligence. I get the benefit of them but I couldn’t build them.

Ask yourself this—how does a toilet work?

Toilets are simple enough. We use them several times a day. There’s a cistern holding water behind the seat. Buttons release that water and it washes away our bodily waste. Simple, right?

Build one.

Oh, not so simple now, huh?

Toilets are a remarkable feat of engineering

Toilets are a remarkable feat of design and engineering—and we take them totally for granted. They’re a great example of how modern society is built on someone else’s intelligence—not yours or mine. We benefit from the intelligence of others, regardless of any intelligence of our own (or any lack thereof).

What would an intelligent extraterrestrial species capable of traversing the stars consider a true sign of our intelligence? What would make them consider you or me intelligent?

It’s an interesting question and one I explore at length in the fictional narrative of Clowns.

As with all of my novels, the book has an afterword exploring the various concepts woven into the story. When it came to Clowns, it was easy to go off on a tangent in the afterword so I pulled a few concepts out and stuck them here for hard-core fans.

Here are the out-takes from the afterword.

Subsidizing The Spectacle

When it comes to economics, most people’s eyes glaze over. Like the example of a toilet, we want to be able to use it, not build it, but our blissful ignorance leaves us vulnerable to being exploited.

Let the free market decide, is the clarion call of economists, but does the market really decide about things like fossil fuels? Or is capitalism a quagmire of conflicting interests? 

Fossil fuel prices are kept artificially low by subsidies even though there’s an undeniable, detrimental effect on humanity. The impact of pollution isn’t limited to climate change. Globally, we waste six trillion dollars a year on fossil fuel subsidies—that’s eleven million dollars a minute! 50% of natural gas and 99% of all coal is priced at less than half its true cost. By subsidizing fossil fuels, the government is lying to us about their benefit to the economy. You pay half in the cost of goods and the other half in tax, but either way, you’re still paying the full amount. It might feel good to pay less for things, but it’s an illusion—and The Spectacle loves nothing more than the allure of a good illusion.

Personally, I’d rather remove all subsidies and let the free market decide! Studies have shown that most of these subsidies go to investors as profit so removing them won’t increase the price of gas, oil or coal—it would simply reduce company profits, while CO2 emissions would reduce by about a third as clean, green energy takes off in a truly free market. The global GDP would increase by 3.8% and one million lives would be saved each year due to reduced air pollution alone!

The Spectacle and The Pandemic

I know this will raise the heckles of those that despise government intrusion, but the free market will not regulate itself. It can’t. Imagine a game of football without a referee—that’s the free market. Left to themselves, companies will lie and cheat and cut corners in order to beat each other and make a buck. The fossil fuel industry, in particular, has demonstrated that it cannot be trusted. 

Governments have their own problems, like corruption and bureaucratic incompetence, but they are “of the people, by the people, for the people.” Their role is to represent us and our best interests. Speed limits are an example of how sometimes they even need to protect us from ourselves. When it comes to capitalism, governments should provide the bit and bridle in the horse’s mouth.

Cholera is an excellent example of proper government intervention. These days, we’re told, “we need to learn to live with COVID,” but we haven’t learned anything as nothing has changed. Politicians are scared of the impact on the economy. The Spectacle will not tolerate any interruptions. Unbridled capitalism is the guiding principle, not the public good. If our modern approach had been applied to the cholera outbreaks in the 1800s, we wouldn’t have sewage systems in our homes or clean drinking water in our taps. Cholera would be left to “individual responsibility.” 

It’s easy to think there are no solutions to something as pervasive and complex as COVID, but that’s not true. There are simple solutions. The adoption of Far UVC lights in places like schools, shopping malls, on trains and planes would drastically cut the transmission rate of all airborne diseases, not just COVID. Far UVC has been shown to be safe and 99.9% effective, but The Spectacle isn’t interested in our health and happiness, only monetary profit. Oh, and just wait. If it is adopted, there will be the usual batshit crazy conspiracy theories undermining the public health effort and resisting change. 

For some bizarre reason, we hate change. We’ll do anything to avoid changing our minds on a subject, even if it means inventing fairy tales. A lifelong friend of mine in the US died during the pandemic. His family couldn’t bring themselves to admit they’d made a mistake by not getting vaccinated. Instead, they blamed his “bad lungs.” The only thing more heartbreaking than losing him was seeing how his family dismissed his death. But they’re not alone. Denial is a defense mechanism. During the height of the pandemic, it was common for people to die denying what was happening to them. 

We all want the pandemic to be over. We all want to “go back to normal,” but as I write this in April 2022, the pandemic is not yet over. Pretending it’s over is a mistake. Don’t confuse the issues at play here: Omicron isn’t mild—vaccines are effective! Without vaccines, Omicron would be killing millions of people. As it is, there’s no lasting immunity to COVID so Omicron is ripping through the country in wave after wave. The elderly, the young and those with compromised immune systems are still dying from this damn thing. And we have no idea just how bad long COVID will be (where people have lingering symptoms).

It’s just a cold,” is one of the worst mantras to come out of the pandemic. The reason people think COVID is just a cold is because there are flu-like symptoms. But what most don’t realize is that a cough, fever, chills, etc, are symptoms of your immune system fighting COVID. That’s why they’re so similar. Same immune system. Same symptoms. These are not COVID symptoms. COVID is a multi-organ virus. Actual COVID symptoms are damage to organs like the lungs, heart, brain and liver, etc—not an annoying cough for a few days. And for most of these organs, the damage isn’t obvious. 

At this point in the pandemic, the best strategy is to avoid repeat infections.

Do you wear a seatbelt?

Do you stop at red lights?

Ask yourself—why? 

To protect yourself. Because of the outside, remote chance you might be hurt in an accident. That’s why you should wear a mask during a pandemic. It’s the same logic. There’s no loss of freedom in wearing a mask. Think of how extraordinarily shortsighted it is for people to be celebrating the “freedom” to remove masks on a plane while still wearing seatbelts! Oh, the irony!

If we want to make contact with an intelligent extraterrestrial species, we’re going to have to start displaying some intelligence ourselves.

You can find Clowns on Amazon in ebook, paperback and hardback.

Creepy clowns personify our fear of being manipulated

23 thoughts on “After the Afterword

  1. I wonder if you’ve read Guy Debord. I shall be getting Clowns when it is in paperback. I spend far too much time in front of a screen to enjoy reading for pleasure on my computer too. Colour me as a boring old fart.

    • Ashley, yes, I’ve read Debord. This novel explores how his theory of The Spectacle is probably the most likely way aliens would interpret the cultures of Earth. If you’ve enjoyed his writing, you’ll love Clowns (and he’s credit in the afterword)

      • PS. I tried to publish this blog post quietly as it is an extension of the ideas in the novel, so you’ve stumbled upon it a little too soon (the book comes out on May 20th). Cheers, Peter

      • Sorry about that. I was researching him and haven’t read him yet. Plan to get a book of his soon. Looks like I’ll have time to read it before your novel is out in paperback.

        Again many apologies for mentioning Debord, just serendipity.

  2. Hi Peter

    Trust you are enjoying the soggy weather in SE QLD. In think I am up to date with your works, really enjoyed Clowns.

    Another author I follow that hails from the USA also suggests that the world governments and in particular his own would scramble potentially violently for alien tech; some others put forward that the idea that we as a planet/race are quarantined until we ‘grow up’ and are not allowed advanced tech until that takes place. Your take on the subject in Clowns was I felt thought provoking.

    Thanks again for another great book such a shame some people are becoming increasingly short sighted, in some ways we would be better off without some of the technology we have now.

    Cheers

    Chris

    • Thanks, Chris. Yes, we think of First Contact being about OUR First Contact, but it could equally be theirs, and they’ll have different goals, perspectives, ideas and agendas to us.

  3. My question for modern “intellects” is always, “can you explain how a light bulb works or what is electricity?” I would now add to that, “How does an LED work?”

  4. I appreciate your stories, but your understanding of the free market leaves something to be desired. As an economist, I see the common fallacies you have inadvertently bought into. A little Thomas Sowell or Milton Friedman or Reason Magazine might open your eyes. Some examples of “successful” government intervention don’t condemn capitalism. And subsidies are absolutely not examples of capitalism, but the exact opposite – counterproductive government intervention. Free market economists hate subsidies of all stripes.

      • The logic in your stories tells me you have the capacity to understand the illogic of that statement. The government alone issues subsidies. Charitably, because it believes it is trying to do good, but more likely emanating from the corruption of power it doesn’t rightly possess and certainly can’t wield without causing harm. As far as turning them down, did you send back your stimulus checks? Do you pay more than your legal taxes? Do you plan to relinquish your social security? Businesses could actually be sued by shareholders for declining legally available subsidies. The government needs to stop or have that power removed. Crony capitalism is not capitalism; it is a corruption made possible by the government.

      • “ “It is a corruption made possible by the government” and not by capitalism or its lobby groups”.
        Correct! Every government ever has had lobbying and subsidies – communist, socialist, republic, monarchies, feudal, tribal, every single one. Capitalism isn’t a form of government.

      • You’re arguing with yourself. I never said it was. I said unbridled capitalism is the most destructive force in 65 million years and (unfortunately) the evidence supports that. Lobby groups are a symptom of unbridled capitalism (good governance would ban them)

      • Capitalism is factually and demonstrably the best force in all history, raising more people out of poverty, creating more well-being of humanity than any other economic system ever. And again, lobbying has nothing to do with capitalism. Every economic system has it.

      • Lobbying has EVERYTHING to do with capitalism. Who do you think is lobbying the government if not corporations? Why are they lobbying the government?

        I never questioned the astonishing benefits capitalism has brought. My point is that UNBRIDLED capitalism is the most destructive force in 65 million years! Like fire, capitalism is a wonderful servant but it is a lousy master. Perhaps the clearest example of this is the lies and damage caused by the fossil fuel industry, which has fought AGAINST the interests of humanity in its unbridled pursuit of money and power

        https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/exxon-knew-about-climate-change-almost-40-years-ago/

        We have not seen the rate of extinction this high since an asteroid slammed into Earth and wiped out the dinosaurs. It’s not the fault of capitalism, it’s the fault of unbridled capitalism. We’re killing the planet for a lousy buck.

        https://royalsociety.org/topics-policy/projects/biodiversity/is-the-rate-of-biodiversity-loss-increasing-or-decreasing/
        https://ourworldindata.org/extinctions

      • The USSR (and Russia under Putin), Communist China (past and present), Eastern Europe under communism, Cuba, Venezuela, Cambodia under the Khmer Rouge, and on and on, were and are far harsher to the environment than any capitalist countries. Collectivism is measurably worse than capitalism for the planet. Furthermore, without corporations, individual owners or heads of state owned industries or Dukes, or Chieftan, or whatever organizational entities exist in the society would lobby the Queen or People’s leader Or governing council for favorable treatment. That’s the nature of all government/governed relationships. That’s not a result of the economic system. The government should not have the ability to grant favors. Subsidies for any industry, even EV’s, green power, or tourism are universally harmful to the environment.
        I have the notion no facts or science will persuade you, so I shall stop now. Good Luck.

      • You’re so close, but you’re not quite there. ANY unbridled power (including communism and capitalism) will act in its own self-interests even if that’s ultimately destructive. The snake will eat its own tail. What is democracy but an attempt at bridling political power on a regular basis so as to hold it accountable? Once you understand the need to bridle power you’ll see the need for this everywhere—including within capitalism itself. Unbridled capitalism is inherently destructive.

Leave a comment